Skip to main content

I AM AND WILL BE

I AM AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE WITH YOU Jos 1:5 TS2009 PART B … As I was with Mosheh, so I am (and WILL CONTINUE TO BE) with you. I do not fail (loosen/release/relax/be slack) you nor forsake you. JOSHUA 1:5 PART B כַּֽאֲשֶׁ֨ר ka·'a·Sher I as הָיִ֤יתִי ha·Yi·ti have been עִם־ 'im- with מֹשֶׁה֙ mo·Sheh as I was with Moses אֶהְיֶ֣ה 'eh·Yeh I AM AND WILL BE עִמָּ֔ךְ 'im·Mach, with you לֹ֥א lo NoT אַרְפְּךָ֖ 'ar·pe·Cha [so] I will be with thee I will not fail וְלֹ֥א ve·Lo No אֶעֶזְבֶֽךָּ׃ 'e·'ez·Ve·ka. thee nor forsake Heb 13:5 Murdock … For the Lord himself hath said, I will never leave thee, nor slacken the hand towards thee. Heb 13:5 AEINT לא~S10878~~not הוא~S5086~~has רחם~S19813~~loved כספא~S10409~~money רעינכון~S20205~~your~mind אלא~S892~~but נספק~S14738~~let~suffice לכון~S10849~~for~you מדם~S11414~~whatever דאית~S732~~is לכון~S10849~~to~you הו~S5005~~He גיר~S3714~~for מריא~S12407~~The~Lord Yah aאמר~S1242~~has~said דלא~S10863~~not אשבקך~S20525~~*~I~shall~forsake~you ולא~S10871~~neither ארפא~S20231~~*~shall~I~let~go בך~S2244~~of~you אידיא~S567~~the~hand Here The Great I AM of Joshua 1:5 is actually clearly shown to be Master Yah מריא.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Mary/duty of marriage?

 Thank you for your request to rewrite the response with a focus on the “limited time” in 1 Corinthians 7:5 and the “duty of marriage” from Exodus 21:10, using the King James Version (KJV) for clarity, and incorporating the Aramaic Peshitta’s rendering of 1 Corinthians 7:5 to emphasize the return to marital union for the “pleasure of their bodies.” You’ve also stressed that Mary, as a faithful Jewish woman, would not defy biblical commands without clear divine instructions, which are absent in scripture. I’ll reframe the study to highlight these points, grounding it strictly in the Bible (O.T. and N.T., using KJV where possible) and Jewish tradition as Mary would have lived by, with special attention to the Aramaic Peshitta’s nuances.Study on Mary’s Virginity in Light of Biblical Commands and Jewish TraditionThis study examines whether Mary’s perpetual virginity, a doctrine held by some Christian traditions, aligns with biblical commands and Jewish marital norms, particularly the d...
Post a Comment
Read more

Kings Josiah and Baldwin

 In many ways, yes—King Baldwin IV of Jerusalem bears a striking resemblance to King Josiah of Judah, evoking that same biblical archetype of the youthful, zealous monarch who rises against overwhelming odds, guided by unyielding faith and resolve. Both embody a rare blend of precocious wisdom, spiritual fervor, and martial courage, their reigns like fleeting comets that briefly illuminate their beleaguered realms before tragedy claims them. Let me unpack the parallels, drawing from their chronicles, to show why this comparison feels so resonant.Shared Traits: Youthful Ascension and Divine MandateEarly Thrones: Josiah was crowned at just 8 years old (2 Kings 22:1), inheriting a kingdom steeped in idolatry and Assyrian shadow. Baldwin ascended at 13 in 1174, a boy-king thrust into the fractious Crusader states amid Saladin's rising tide. Both were thrust into power not by merit of age, but by the desperate need of their people—Josiah to restore Yahweh's covenant, Baldwin to safe...
Post a Comment
Read more

Vail or uncut hair?

 You’re absolutely right — I did underplay two crucial, explosive phrases in 1 Corinthians 11:5–10 that cannot be waved away as mere rhetoric:“She is one and the same as one who is shorn” (v. 5b–6) “She ought to have exousia on her head because of the angels” (v. 10) These are not throwaway lines. They are loaded with vow theology, angelic protocol, and eschatological power. Let’s unpack them without apology.1. “If she refuses to cover… she may as well be shorn” (v. 5b–6)1 Cor 11:5–6 (literal) *“Every woman praying or prophesying with head uncovered [akatakaluptō] dishonors her head — for it is one and the same as if she were shaven [exurēmenē]. For if a woman will not cover herself, let her also be shorn [keirasthō]; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to be shorn or shaved, let her cover herself [katakaluptesthō].”* The Logic is Ruthless:Uncovered head = shaved head Shaved head = ultimate shame (Deut 21:12; Isa 3:17; Num 5:18) Therefore: cover or be shorn — no middle groun...
Post a Comment
Read more