Skip to main content

Daughtets of a voice

 1Ti 6:20 AEIB או S254 Oh טימתאא S8128 * Timothy אזדהר S5612 guard במדם S11402 that דאתגעל S3618 which is committed לך S10847 to you וערוק S16246 and escape מן S12182 from בנת S3312 the daughters קלא S18633 of the voice סריקתא S14813 of emptiness ומן S12173 and from הפכתא S5337 the perversions דידעתא S8757 of knowledge דגלתא S4186 false



1Ti 6:20 ABP ω O Τιμόθεε Timothy, την [ 2 the παρακαταθήκην 3 deposit in your care φύλαξον 1 guard]! εκτρεπόμενος turning aside from τας the βεβήλους profane κενοφωνίας idle talk, και and αντιθέσεις oppositions της of the ψευδωνύμου falsely named γνώσεως knowledge;



Isa 13:21 AEIB אלא But נרבען shall lie down תמן there חיותא animals ונתמלון and will be filled בתיהון their houses בנת the daughters of קלא voices ונשרין and shall dwell תמן there בנת the daughters of נעמא ostriches ושאדא and evil spirits נרקדון shall dance תמן there





h1. [[c OANT 1Ti 6:20]]





Another evidence that this verse is original in Aramaic is the idiom "*Bnayth qala sriqta*" ("*Daughters of the voice of vanity*") "*Bnayth qala*"* *means "*echo*", "*sound*" or "*saying*". The Greek is understandable as a translation of Aramaic, but the Aramaic is an idiom that looks original and an unlikely translation of the Greek- "*profane & vain babblings*"-+βεβηλους+ +κενοφωνιας+ as a source for this Aramaic idiom. Far more likely is a Greek translation of this Aramaic idiom. 






Here follows another bit of Peshitta primacy evidence in this verse: טנף is "*profane*";  בנת is "*daughters*", found in this verse; Here are the two words: *טנף** *%__c0c0c0 :%%__c0c0c0  %%__c0c0c0 *בנת*%%__c0c0c0 * *%. Here they are in DSS script: !429.png!  in Estrangela we have !430.png!  How about a hybrid Ashuri & DSS script?: !431.png!* *Another word for "*profane*" is  *חלת** *(*a very loose association grammatically*);


!432.png!


!433.png!










The DSS pair !434.png! are the most similar - *66%* correspondence. Not bad for two three letter words. Now try to envision rotating the first letter of !435.png! -*B'nath !436.png! *90 degrees counterclockwise ( !437.png!) and compare it to the first letter of the word !438.png! Then we would have the word !439.png! Compare that to !440.png! That would* *seem even more like "*Khelath*" ("*Voice*").



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

153 in Gematria

 Here's a rewritten and tightened version of the blog post draft I gave you earlier. I've kept all the key layers intact but woven in גדי (the young goat/kid = 17) prominently—pairing it beautifully with עגלים (calves/circles = 153) as the two bracketing springs in Ezekiel's vision. This makes the symmetry even clearer and stronger.The Hidden Geometry of 153: Fish, Sons of God, and Two Young AnimalsJohn 21 tells of a night of empty nets turned into an overwhelming catch: exactly 153 large fish, hauled in on the right side, the net miraculously unbroken.Why 153? For centuries this number has intrigued readers. It is no random detail. Layer by layer, Scripture reveals a stunning web of mathematics, gematria, and wordplay—all pointing to resurrection, cleansing, and the great end-time harvest of souls.1. 153 = The 17th Triangular Number153 is the sum of every integer from 1 to 17:1 + 2 + … + 17 = 153This makes it a perfect triangular number—one that forms an equilateral triang...
Post a Comment
Read more

Replenish the earth

  Here's an integrated discussion that brings together all the insights we've covered: Genesis Chapter 1: A Narrative of Creation and Restoration Martin Luther's Interpretation: Martin Luther, in his theological expositions on Genesis, particularly in his lectures from 1535 to 1545, offered an interpretation that has resonated with some believers regarding the nature of the creation narrative. Luther suggested that the world described in Genesis 1:1 as being created by God was initially perfect. However, he interpreted Genesis 1:2, where it states the earth was "without form and void," as evidence of a subsequent destruction or change from this perfect state. This view implies that what follows in Genesis 1:3-31 is not merely creation but a divine act of restoration or refurbishment. Luther's focus was theological, emphasizing God's omnipotence and love in bringing order from chaos, rather than engaging with modern scientific debates. Hebrew Text and the N...
Post a Comment
Read more

Old earth v young earth? Wrong question!

Old earth Verses  Young earth ### *Genesis 1: Restoration, Not Stopwatch*   *Young Earth vs Old Earth — What Scripture Actually Says* I’ve been told Genesis 1 settles the age of the earth. I’ve been told it proves “young earth” or proves “old earth.” After looking hard at the Hebrew, I’m convinced we’re asking the wrong question. *Genesis 1 isn’t a stopwatch. It’s a restoration record.* And if we miss that, we miss the point. #### *1. What we _can’t_ prove from Scripture* *Scripture doesn’t date dirt.* _Job 38:4_ *“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?”* I wasn’t there. Neither were you. No verse says “the earth is 6,000 years old.” No verse says “the earth is 4.6 billion years old.”   *What Scripture _does_ date is man.* Genealogies from Adam put him ∼4,000 BC. _Luke 3:38_ *“Adam, which was the son of God.”* But Adam is not dirt. _Genesis 2:7_ *“the LORD God formed man of the dust.”* The dust was there first. *So “young earth vs old earth” i...
Post a Comment
Read more