Skip to main content

Judgment or sheltet?

 (Isa 16:3 TS2009)  “Bring counsel, execute judgment; make your shadow like the night in the middle of the day; hide the outcasts, do not betray him who escapes.


IIsa 16:3 LOGOS take farther counsel, and continually make a shelter from grief; they flee in darkness at midday; they are amazed; do not be led captive.


Strongs #6415: AHLB#: 1380-B (b1)


1380) Lp% (Lp% PL) ac: Plead co: ? ab: Judgment: The pictograph p is a picture of mouth, the l is a picture of a shepherd staff representing authority. Combined these mean "speak to authority". A coming to one in authority to intercede on ones own behalf or for another



Palal for pray or intercede, is spelled here as paliyl, making it what early Hebrew grammarians called a verbal noun. Thus the action of intercession, brings about a thing, called a judgment. However, the Jewish translators of the LXX, saw something else. They saw a shelter, which would protect one from grief. 


Yet, this cannot be explained away by the picture associated with palal. But rather, from a deeper understanding of the root cause of grief, which is sin:


Chata: does mean sin, but it also has the meaning of purge, as David wrote:



Psa 51:7 KJV Purge me with hyssop, and I shall be clean: wash me, and I shall be whiter than snow.


The word purge is chata, 2398 Strongs. To understand how chata can mean sin, and purge from sin, one must look deep into the picture associated with its letters:

Chet= a covering

Tet = something surrounding, enclosing, protecting

aleph= is a hand reaching up to Yah, and Yah reaching a hand down to mankind


When purged, mankind is able to abide under the protection of the Almighty, but once one walks outside that protection, they are walking in sin. 


This is the perfect picture of walking in the Spirit!


May we escape from all the pain and suffering which comes as a result of sin, and not be held captive to sin, but rather, abide under the shelter of the blood of Yeshua.

It is entirely possible, that someone did not know that they needed to plead and pray with intercession for their shelter from sin, and that  they would not grow weary abiding within the confines of its protection.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fruits of life

Understanding Hebrews 6:4-6: Repentance, Vengeance on Disobedience, and the Fruits of Salvation The passage in Hebrews 6:4-6 is often misunderstood, but when examined closely, it offers profound insights into the nature of repentance, the active "revenge" on disobedience, and the fruits that accompany true salvation. Here's a closer look: Hebrews 6:4-6 (NIV): "For it is impossible for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit, who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age and who have fallen away, to be brought back to repentance. To their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace." This passage might seem to suggest a finality to repentance, but the context reveals a deeper message: Repentance Beyond Mere Acknowledgement: Repentance is not just a personal acknowledgment but must lead to actions that bear witness...

Mary/duty of marriage?

 Thank you for your request to rewrite the response with a focus on the “limited time” in 1 Corinthians 7:5 and the “duty of marriage” from Exodus 21:10, using the King James Version (KJV) for clarity, and incorporating the Aramaic Peshitta’s rendering of 1 Corinthians 7:5 to emphasize the return to marital union for the “pleasure of their bodies.” You’ve also stressed that Mary, as a faithful Jewish woman, would not defy biblical commands without clear divine instructions, which are absent in scripture. I’ll reframe the study to highlight these points, grounding it strictly in the Bible (O.T. and N.T., using KJV where possible) and Jewish tradition as Mary would have lived by, with special attention to the Aramaic Peshitta’s nuances.Study on Mary’s Virginity in Light of Biblical Commands and Jewish TraditionThis study examines whether Mary’s perpetual virginity, a doctrine held by some Christian traditions, aligns with biblical commands and Jewish marital norms, particularly the d...

William Tyndale Catholic execution

 William Tyndale's Death and Historical ContextWas William Tyndale Murdered by Catholics or Protestants? William Tyndale, an English scholar and translator famous for his English Bible translation, was executed on October 6, 1536, in Vilvoorde, near Brussels (then in the Spanish Netherlands, part of the Holy Roman Empire). He was murdered (executed) by Catholic authorities, specifically under the orders of the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V's administration, which was staunchly Catholic. Tyndale was convicted of heresy for his Protestant Reformation-aligned activities, particularly translating the Bible into English, which challenged Catholic control over scripture access. His translation work (e.g., the 1526 New Testament) was seen as heretical because it bypassed Latin and undermined Church authority.Details of Execution: Tyndale was betrayed by Henry Phillips, an English Catholic agent, lured to Antwerp, arrested in 1535, and held for over a year. He was tried for heresy, foun...