Skip to main content

Light or bribe?

 2 ancient texts read

Isa 8:20 LBP (ES) As for the law and the testimony, if they do not speak according to this word, it is because they do not receive a bribe for it.


Modern Bibles read: they have no light in them


Isa 8:20 KJV To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.


Difference is one Hebrew letter. Both of which make a k or kh sound. 


Truly there seems to be no earthly reward for speaking truth of scripture. But to refuse to do so, causes our light to become darkness.

".. If the light within thee be darkness, how great is that darkness..."


Isa 8:20 HiSB לְתוֹרָ֖ה le·to·Rah To the law וְלִתְעוּדָ֑ה ve·lit·'u·Dah; and to the testimony אִם־ 'im- If לֹ֤א lo not יֹֽאמְרוּ֙ yo·me·Ru if they speak כַּדָּבָ֣ר kad·da·Var not according to this word הַזֶּ֔ה haz·Zeh, to this אֲשֶׁ֥ר 'a·Sher is because אֵֽין־ 'ein- have ל֖וֹ lo שָֽׁחַר׃ Sha·char. [it is] because [there is] no light


Light here is Shachar with a chet.

But Peshitta and LXX have bribe or reward, which looks like Shakar with a kaph

However, Ach Gregory pointed out the obvious, which can be seen by comparing the Hebrew Shachar to the Aramaic Shachuwd. (Which I should have seen, But neglected to pay attention to, For a lack of easy access to the Aramaic Lexicon. Which is time consuming). Therefore, either the resh was once mistaken for a deleth, or, a deleth was mistaken for a resh. For the Hebrew word Shachad does simply mean bribe or gift.


Isa 8:20 AEIB לנמוסא to the Written Law ולסהדותא and to the testimony דלא for not נאמרון they will speak איך according to מלתא word הדא this דלית because there is none למתל to give עליה for it שוחדא a bribe


Isa 8:20 ABP νόμον [ 3 the law γαρ 1 For εις 4 for βοήθειαν 5 a help έδωκεν 2 he gave], ίνα that είπωσιν they should speak ουχ not ως as το ρήμα τούτο this saying, περί concerning ου of which ουκ έστι there are no δώρα gifts δούναι to give περί for αυτού it.


It appears that there is no earthly reward, wage, in context, bribe, for speaking the truth of Scripture.

However, if we do not do so, then there is no light in us.




May Yah our Yeshua bless and keep you!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

153 in Gematria

 Here's a rewritten and tightened version of the blog post draft I gave you earlier. I've kept all the key layers intact but woven in גדי (the young goat/kid = 17) prominently—pairing it beautifully with עגלים (calves/circles = 153) as the two bracketing springs in Ezekiel's vision. This makes the symmetry even clearer and stronger.The Hidden Geometry of 153: Fish, Sons of God, and Two Young AnimalsJohn 21 tells of a night of empty nets turned into an overwhelming catch: exactly 153 large fish, hauled in on the right side, the net miraculously unbroken.Why 153? For centuries this number has intrigued readers. It is no random detail. Layer by layer, Scripture reveals a stunning web of mathematics, gematria, and wordplay—all pointing to resurrection, cleansing, and the great end-time harvest of souls.1. 153 = The 17th Triangular Number153 is the sum of every integer from 1 to 17:1 + 2 + … + 17 = 153This makes it a perfect triangular number—one that forms an equilateral triang...
Post a Comment
Read more

Replenish the earth

  Here's an integrated discussion that brings together all the insights we've covered: Genesis Chapter 1: A Narrative of Creation and Restoration Martin Luther's Interpretation: Martin Luther, in his theological expositions on Genesis, particularly in his lectures from 1535 to 1545, offered an interpretation that has resonated with some believers regarding the nature of the creation narrative. Luther suggested that the world described in Genesis 1:1 as being created by God was initially perfect. However, he interpreted Genesis 1:2, where it states the earth was "without form and void," as evidence of a subsequent destruction or change from this perfect state. This view implies that what follows in Genesis 1:3-31 is not merely creation but a divine act of restoration or refurbishment. Luther's focus was theological, emphasizing God's omnipotence and love in bringing order from chaos, rather than engaging with modern scientific debates. Hebrew Text and the N...
Post a Comment
Read more

Old earth v young earth? Wrong question!

Old earth Verses  Young earth ### *Genesis 1: Restoration, Not Stopwatch*   *Young Earth vs Old Earth — What Scripture Actually Says* I’ve been told Genesis 1 settles the age of the earth. I’ve been told it proves “young earth” or proves “old earth.” After looking hard at the Hebrew, I’m convinced we’re asking the wrong question. *Genesis 1 isn’t a stopwatch. It’s a restoration record.* And if we miss that, we miss the point. #### *1. What we _can’t_ prove from Scripture* *Scripture doesn’t date dirt.* _Job 38:4_ *“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?”* I wasn’t there. Neither were you. No verse says “the earth is 6,000 years old.” No verse says “the earth is 4.6 billion years old.”   *What Scripture _does_ date is man.* Genealogies from Adam put him ∼4,000 BC. _Luke 3:38_ *“Adam, which was the son of God.”* But Adam is not dirt. _Genesis 2:7_ *“the LORD God formed man of the dust.”* The dust was there first. *So “young earth vs old earth” i...
Post a Comment
Read more