Skip to main content

Ps 22 Aramaic usage

*Other Aramaisms in Psalm 22* Psalm 22 has several words/phrases that are either Aramaic loanwords or show Aramaic influence. That’s not unusual — Davidic psalms often have northern/Aramean dialect features, and Psalm 22 in particular is linguistically mixed. Here are the main ones scholars point to, besides *כראו* in v.16: ### *1. v.1 אֵלִי אֵלִי* _’eli ’eli_ “My God, my God” *Hebrew*: Usually *אֱלֹהַי* _’elohay_ “my God.” *אֵלִי* _’eli_ is *Aramaic-influenced* or poetic dialect. *Mark 15:34* preserves it: *Eloi, Eloi* = transliteration of the Aramaic form used in 1st century. *Targum Ps 22:2*: *אֵלִי אֵלִי* keeps it. Normal Hebrew would edit to _’elohay_. ### *2. v.2 שַׁאֲגָתִי* _sha’agati_ “my roaring/groaning” *Root שׁאג* _sha’ag_ = “to roar” like a lion. *In Hebrew*: Used for lions, not people. *Isaiah 5:29* _sha’ag_ = lion roar. *In Aramaic*: *שׁאג* used for human groaning/crying. *Daniel 6:21* Aramaic _ze’iq_ but Syriac Peshitta uses _sha’eg_ for Daniel’s cry. *Psalm 22 uses lion-roar for human agony* — Aramaic semantic range. ### *3. v.7 יַפְטִירוּ בְשָׂפָה* _yaftiru be-saphah_ “they open wide with the lip” *הפטיר* _hiphtir_ = “open, separate” *Hebrew*: Rare. *Ezekiel 21:28* _haptar_ “drawn” of a sword. *Aramaic*: *פטר* _petar_ = common word for “open, release, begin.” *Daniel 5:12* _mipshar_ “interpreting” = opening meaning. *Targum Ps 22:8*: *יפטרון בשפוון* _yiftrun be-sipvan_ — keeps Aramaic root. *Normal Hebrew*: _pa’ar peh_ “open mouth.” Psalm 22 uses Aramaic idiom. ### *4. v.13 כַּרִים* _karim_ “strong bulls” *Hebrew*: *פָּרִים* _parim_ is usual word for “bulls.” *Ps 50:13* _parim_. *כַּרִים* from *כַּר* _kar_ = “pasture, young ram, fatling.” *Aramaic*: *כַּר* = “lamb, fatling” but also used for “mighty one.” *Targum Onqelos Gen 31:38* _kar_ = ram. *Ps 22:13* uses rare _karim_ = *Aramaic-influenced poetic choice* for “mighty bulls of Bashan.” ### *5. v.15 הָיָה לִבִּי כַּדּוֹנָג* _hayah libbi ka-donag_ “my heart is like wax” *דּוֹנָג* _donag_ “wax” — *only here in Hebrew Bible.* *Aramaic/Syriac*: *דונגא* _dunga_ = “wax” is standard. *Targum Ps 22:15* uses *כדונגא*. *Hebrew usually*: *שַׁעֲוָה* _sha’awah_ for wax, *Exod 16:31*. *Psalm 22 picks Aramaic word.* MT keeps it because there’s no Hebrew equivalent in poetry. ### *6. v.17 סְבָבוּנִי* _sevavuni_ “they surrounded me” + *הִקִּיפוּנִי* _hiqqiphuni_ “they encircled me” *Hebrew*: _savav_ is normal. *הִקִּיפוּ* _hiqqiph_ = “go around, encircle.” *Aramaic*: *נקף* _neqaph_ = “surround” is very common. *Daniel 6:25* _maqreban_ Aramaic influence. *Doubling סְבָבוּנִי... הִקִּיפוּנִי* mirrors *Aramaic parallelism* seen in Daniel. Hebrew usually picks one verb. ### *7. v.21 מִיד־כֶּלֶב* _mi-yad kelev_ “from the hand of the dog” *יָד* _yad_ “hand” used for “power, grasp” of animals — *Aramaism*. *Hebrew*: Would say _mi-pi kelev_ “from the mouth of the dog.” *Ps 59:15* _kelev_ with _savav_ but no _yad_. *Aramaic*: *יד* used for power of anything. *Daniel 3:15* _mi-yedi_ “from my hand” = my power. *Ps 22:21* uses _yad_ for dog’s power — *Aramaic idiom*. ### *8. v.29 לֹא־חִיָּה נַפְשׁוֹ* _lo-chiyyah naphsho_ “he did not keep his soul alive” *חִיָּה* _chiyyah_ pi‘el “keep alive” *Hebrew*: Usually _hecheyah_ hiph‘il. *Gen 19:19* _lehachayot naphshi_. *Aramaic*: *חַיִּי* _chayyi_ pi‘el “preserve life” is standard. *Targum Ps 22:30* _la chayyi naphsheh_. *Ps 22 uses Aramaic binyan.* --- ### *Why So Many Aramaisms?* *1. Geographic*: David fought Aram-Zobah, Aram-Damascus. Northern Israel had Aramaic contact 1000 BC. *2. Dialect*: Psalm 22 has “northern” features like Hosea, Song of Songs. *3. Date*: If post-exilic editing occurred, Aramaic was lingua franca after 586 BC. *4. Poetic*: Aramaic words sound exotic, heightened. Like Shakespeare using French. *The key point*: *כראו* in v.16 isn’t isolated. Psalm 22 is already Aramaic-heavy. A scribe seeing *כראו* wouldn’t think “error.” He’d think “Aramaic loanword” — normal for this Psalm. *So the change to כארי “like a lion” isn’t just one error. It’s part of a pattern of removing Aramaisms/messianic readings post-70 AD.* *List summary:* **Verse** **Aramaism** **Hebrew Normal** **Meaning** **22:1** **אֵלִי** *’eli* אֱלֹהַי *’elohay* “my God” **22:2** **שַׁאֲגָתִי** *sha’agati* נַאֲקָתִי *na’aqati* “my groaning” **22:7** **יַפְטִירוּ** *yaftiru* יִפְעֲרוּ *yif‘aru* “they open wide” **22:13** **כַּרִים** *karim* פָּרִים *parim* “bulls” **22:15** **דּוֹנָג** *donag* שַׁעֲוָה *sha‘awah* “wax” **22:16** **כראו** *ke’aru* כָּרוּ *karu* “they pierced” **22:21** **מִיַּד־כֶּלֶב** *mi-yad kelev* מִפִּי־כֶלֶב *mi-pi kelev* “from dog’s power” **22:29** **חִיָּה** *chiyyah* הֶחֱיָה *hecheyah* “keep alive” *Psalm 22 is swimming in Aramaic. כראו fits right in. כארי doesn’t.* Want me to check *Psalm 110* for Aramaisms too? Same pattern shows up there.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

153 in Gematria

 Here's a rewritten and tightened version of the blog post draft I gave you earlier. I've kept all the key layers intact but woven in גדי (the young goat/kid = 17) prominently—pairing it beautifully with עגלים (calves/circles = 153) as the two bracketing springs in Ezekiel's vision. This makes the symmetry even clearer and stronger.The Hidden Geometry of 153: Fish, Sons of God, and Two Young AnimalsJohn 21 tells of a night of empty nets turned into an overwhelming catch: exactly 153 large fish, hauled in on the right side, the net miraculously unbroken.Why 153? For centuries this number has intrigued readers. It is no random detail. Layer by layer, Scripture reveals a stunning web of mathematics, gematria, and wordplay—all pointing to resurrection, cleansing, and the great end-time harvest of souls.1. 153 = The 17th Triangular Number153 is the sum of every integer from 1 to 17:1 + 2 + … + 17 = 153This makes it a perfect triangular number—one that forms an equilateral triang...

Replenish the earth

  Here's an integrated discussion that brings together all the insights we've covered: Genesis Chapter 1: A Narrative of Creation and Restoration Martin Luther's Interpretation: Martin Luther, in his theological expositions on Genesis, particularly in his lectures from 1535 to 1545, offered an interpretation that has resonated with some believers regarding the nature of the creation narrative. Luther suggested that the world described in Genesis 1:1 as being created by God was initially perfect. However, he interpreted Genesis 1:2, where it states the earth was "without form and void," as evidence of a subsequent destruction or change from this perfect state. This view implies that what follows in Genesis 1:3-31 is not merely creation but a divine act of restoration or refurbishment. Luther's focus was theological, emphasizing God's omnipotence and love in bringing order from chaos, rather than engaging with modern scientific debates. Hebrew Text and the N...

Old earth v young earth? Wrong question!

Old earth Verses  Young earth ### *Genesis 1: Restoration, Not Stopwatch*   *Young Earth vs Old Earth — What Scripture Actually Says* I’ve been told Genesis 1 settles the age of the earth. I’ve been told it proves “young earth” or proves “old earth.” After looking hard at the Hebrew, I’m convinced we’re asking the wrong question. *Genesis 1 isn’t a stopwatch. It’s a restoration record.* And if we miss that, we miss the point. #### *1. What we _can’t_ prove from Scripture* *Scripture doesn’t date dirt.* _Job 38:4_ *“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?”* I wasn’t there. Neither were you. No verse says “the earth is 6,000 years old.” No verse says “the earth is 4.6 billion years old.”   *What Scripture _does_ date is man.* Genealogies from Adam put him ∼4,000 BC. _Luke 3:38_ *“Adam, which was the son of God.”* But Adam is not dirt. _Genesis 2:7_ *“the LORD God formed man of the dust.”* The dust was there first. *So “young earth vs old earth” i...