Skip to main content

Ps 22 v Isaiah 53 why edit one/not the other

*One Letter at a Time: How Psalm 22 Lost Its Resurrection and Why Isaiah 53 Kept Its Seed* --- *Yeshua died quoting it. The early church preached it. The rabbis edited it.* *And the scrolls tell us exactly when and why.* ### *The Text That Started It All* *Mark 15:34* _“Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachthani?”_ — *Psalm 22:1* When a Rabbi dies quoting Scripture, His disciples go read the whole chapter. And in Psalm 22 they found: *v.16* _“They pierced my hands and feet”_ — *כראו* *v.18* _“They divide my garments”_ — fulfilled John 19:24 *v.7* _“All who see me mock”_ — Matthew 27:39 *Psalm 22 was the #1 evangelistic text 30-100 AD.* The New Testament quotes it *13 times*. Isaiah 53? *8 times*. *If you were a 1st-century rabbi watching Jews believe in Yeshua, what text would you edit first?* *The one they were actually using.* ### *The Edit Nobody Noticed: Psalm 22:29-31* *Here’s what we have today in MT:* *Psalm 22:30* _“And his soul he did not keep alive”_ *וְנַפְשׁוֹ לֹא חִיָּה* *Psalm 22:31* _“A seed shall serve Him”_ *זֶרַע יַעַבְדֶנּוּ* *Here’s what the ancient world read:* *LXX 250 BC*: _“And MY soul shall live FOR HIM... MY seed shall serve Him”_ *Peshitta 150 AD*: _“And his soul he did not keep alive... a seed shall serve Him”_ *Targum*: _“And my soul shall live before Him... sons shall serve Him”_ *Vulgate 400 AD*: _“And MY soul shall live for Him... MY seed shall serve Him”_ *Two changes. One stroke each.* *Change 1: לוֹ → לֹא* *ו* to *א*. _“To/for Him”_ becomes _“not.”_ *“Live FOR God”* becomes *“NOT live.”* That’s resurrection erased. *Change 2: נַפְשִׁי → נַפְשׁוֹ* and *זַרְעִי → זֶרַע* *י* to *ו*, then drop the *י*. _“My soul... my seed”_ becomes _“his soul... a seed.”_ *Looks minor. Implications are major.* The speaker gets cut out of His own resurrection, and the seed is no longer HIS. *Same scribal errors as v.16 כראו “pierced” → כארי “lion.”* One letter every time. ### *Why Peshitta Proves the Timeline* *Peshitta agrees with MT*: _“his soul not... a seed.”_ *Peshitta agrees with LXX*: _“they pierced”_ *כראו*. *That tells us when the edits happened:* *250 BC*: LXX sees *נַפְשִׁי לוֹ, זַרְעִי, כראו* — all intact *50 AD*: 5/6HevPs still has *כראו* — v.16 not changed yet *100-150 AD*: Hebrew text changes *נַפְשִׁי לוֹ→נַפְשׁוֹ לֹא* and *זַרְעִי→זֶרַע* *150 AD*: Peshitta translates the changed text *Post-150 AD*: Hebrew text changes *כראו→כארי* *Peshitta is the timestamp.* It caught edit #1 but missed edit #2. *They edited resurrection first, “pierced” second.* ### *But Why Change Psalm 22 and Leave Isaiah 53?* *Look at the scrolls.* *Great Isaiah Scroll [1QIsaª]*: *24 feet long*, 54 columns, 66 chapters. One scribe. One unit. Public reading every Yom Kippur. *Hundreds of copies* by 100 AD. LXX already public since 250 BC. *Great Psalms Scroll [11QPsª]*: *18 feet long*, but incomplete. *Psalms was 5 separate books*, 5 separate scrolls. Book 1 had Psalm 22. Less public. More Aramaic. Not memorized verse-by-verse. *You can edit a 5-foot prayer book quietly. You can’t edit a 24-foot cathedral scroll without a riot.* *Isaiah 53:10* _“He shall see seed, He shall prolong days”_ *יִרְאֶה זֶרַע* *Dead men don’t see seed. Dead men don’t prolong days.* MT left it in. Why? *Because by 100 AD it was too famous to touch.* LXX had it. Targum had it. Every synagogue had it. *So they reinterpreted it instead.* Rashi 1100 AD: “The Servant is Israel.” Problem solved. *But Psalm 22:30 נַפְשִׁי לוֹ? Nobody was watching that verse in 100 AD.* Christians were using v.1, v.16, v.18. *v.30-31 flew under the radar.* So they changed it. ### *The Pattern: Kill the Clear Texts First* **Text** **Pre-Edit** **Post-Edit** **Date** **Why Changed** **Ps 22:30** **נַפְשִׁי לוֹ** “my soul for Him” **נַפְשׁוֹ לֹא** “his soul not” **Pre-150 AD** **Resurrection too blatant** **Ps 22:31** **זַרְעִי** “my seed” **זֶרַע** “a seed” **Pre-150 AD** **Links to Messiah’s seed** **Ps 22:16** **כראו** “pierced” **כארי** “lion” **Post-150 AD** **Christians quoting it** **Isa 53:9** **במותו** “in his death” **במתיו** “in his deaths” **Post-70 AD** **One death = Gospel** **Isa 53:11** **יִרְוֶה** “satisfied” **יִרְאֶה** “see” **Post-70 AD** **“Satisfied” = resurrection** **Isa 53:10** **יִרְאֶה זֶרַע** “see seed” **יִרְאֶה זֶרַע** **Unchanged** **Too famous to touch** *Every edit goes one direction: away from a dying, rising, seed-bearing Messiah.* *Every edit is one letter: ו/י, א/ה, ר/ד.* ### *So What Did Psalm 22 Say Before the Edits?* *v.15* _“You lay me in dust of death”_ — He dies *v.16* _“They pierced my hands and feet”_ — *כראו* How He dies *v.30* _“And MY soul shall live FOR HIM”_ — *נַפְשִׁי לוֹ* He rises to God *v.31* _“MY seed shall serve Him”_ — *זַרְעִי* His resurrection births a people *v.27-29* _“All nations shall worship”_ — The result *That’s Isaiah 53:10 in a Psalm.* _“When You make His soul a guilt offering, He shall see seed, He shall prolong days.”_ *Dead men don’t see seed. But resurrected men do.* *And the seed? That’s us.* _“Born again to a living hope through the resurrection of Yeshua”_ *1 Peter 1:3*. _“If you are Messiah’s, you are Abraham’s seed”_ *Galatians 3:29*. *MT’s זֶרַע instead of זַרְעִי cuts that cord.* *LXX’s זַרְעִי ties it back.* ### *Why This Matters* *They didn’t edit Isaiah 53:10 because they couldn’t.* It was a 24-foot scroll in every synagogue. *They edited Psalm 22:30-31 because they could.* It was a prayer in Book 1 of 5, changed before 150 AD when nobody was looking. *Aquila 130 AD proves it.* He made a new Greek translation for Jews to replace the “too Christian” LXX. His Psalm 22:30? _“His soul he did not keep alive”_ = *נַפְשׁוֹ לֹא*. *The edit was deliberate, official, and anti-Gospel.* *But they missed one.* Isaiah 53:10 _“He shall see seed”_ is still there. *Dead men don’t see seed.* That one verse proves the resurrection MT tried to erase from Psalm 22. ### *Bottom Line* *Yeshua quoted Psalm 22 from the cross.* *The early church used it to convert Jews 30-100 AD.* *Rabbis edited it 100-150 AD to stop the bleeding.* *Peshitta captured the edits. LXX preserves what it said before.* *Isaiah 53 survived because it was too big to kill.* *One letter at a time. לוֹ→לֹא. זַרְעִי→זֶרַע. כראו→כארי.* *Three pen strokes erased resurrection and seed from Psalm 22.* *But the ancient witnesses remember.* *The Strong Man was pierced. His soul lives for Him. His seed serves Him. To the coming generation.* *That’s the Gospel. Before the edits.*

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

153 in Gematria

 Here's a rewritten and tightened version of the blog post draft I gave you earlier. I've kept all the key layers intact but woven in גדי (the young goat/kid = 17) prominently—pairing it beautifully with עגלים (calves/circles = 153) as the two bracketing springs in Ezekiel's vision. This makes the symmetry even clearer and stronger.The Hidden Geometry of 153: Fish, Sons of God, and Two Young AnimalsJohn 21 tells of a night of empty nets turned into an overwhelming catch: exactly 153 large fish, hauled in on the right side, the net miraculously unbroken.Why 153? For centuries this number has intrigued readers. It is no random detail. Layer by layer, Scripture reveals a stunning web of mathematics, gematria, and wordplay—all pointing to resurrection, cleansing, and the great end-time harvest of souls.1. 153 = The 17th Triangular Number153 is the sum of every integer from 1 to 17:1 + 2 + … + 17 = 153This makes it a perfect triangular number—one that forms an equilateral triang...

Replenish the earth

  Here's an integrated discussion that brings together all the insights we've covered: Genesis Chapter 1: A Narrative of Creation and Restoration Martin Luther's Interpretation: Martin Luther, in his theological expositions on Genesis, particularly in his lectures from 1535 to 1545, offered an interpretation that has resonated with some believers regarding the nature of the creation narrative. Luther suggested that the world described in Genesis 1:1 as being created by God was initially perfect. However, he interpreted Genesis 1:2, where it states the earth was "without form and void," as evidence of a subsequent destruction or change from this perfect state. This view implies that what follows in Genesis 1:3-31 is not merely creation but a divine act of restoration or refurbishment. Luther's focus was theological, emphasizing God's omnipotence and love in bringing order from chaos, rather than engaging with modern scientific debates. Hebrew Text and the N...

Old earth v young earth? Wrong question!

Old earth Verses  Young earth ### *Genesis 1: Restoration, Not Stopwatch*   *Young Earth vs Old Earth — What Scripture Actually Says* I’ve been told Genesis 1 settles the age of the earth. I’ve been told it proves “young earth” or proves “old earth.” After looking hard at the Hebrew, I’m convinced we’re asking the wrong question. *Genesis 1 isn’t a stopwatch. It’s a restoration record.* And if we miss that, we miss the point. #### *1. What we _can’t_ prove from Scripture* *Scripture doesn’t date dirt.* _Job 38:4_ *“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?”* I wasn’t there. Neither were you. No verse says “the earth is 6,000 years old.” No verse says “the earth is 4.6 billion years old.”   *What Scripture _does_ date is man.* Genealogies from Adam put him ∼4,000 BC. _Luke 3:38_ *“Adam, which was the son of God.”* But Adam is not dirt. _Genesis 2:7_ *“the LORD God formed man of the dust.”* The dust was there first. *So “young earth vs old earth” i...