Skip to main content

Ps 68:2 verified

*Psalm 68:2 / Hebrew 68:3 — Your translation* _“Let all the wicked be driven away as smoke and vanish before the presence of Elohiym, and become as wax which is melted before the fire.”_ ### *Ancient witnesses* *MT Hebrew 68:3*: _kəhindōph ʿāshān tinnādēph kəhimmēs dônag mippənê-ʾēsh yōʾḇədû rəshāʿîm mippənê ʾelōhîm_ *Literal*: “As smoke is driven away, you drive away; as wax melts before fire, the wicked perish before Elohim.” *LXX Greek 68:3*: _hōs ekleipei kapnos, ekleipetōsan; hōs tēketai kēros apo prosōpou pyros, houtōs apolointo hoi hamartōloi apo prosōpou tou theou_ “As smoke vanishes, let them vanish; as wax melts from before fire, so let the sinners perish from before God.” *Peshitta Syriac*: _ayk d’metbaḏar tnānā netbaḏrun; ayk d’pāʾeš shaʿwā men qḏām nūrā, hākanā neʾḇdun ḥaṭāyē men qḏām alāhā_ “As smoke is scattered, let them be scattered; as wax melts before fire, so let sinners perish before God.” *Targum*: _hêkh deʾitbaddar tanana titbaddar; hêkh deʾitpashar shaʿwā min qŏḏām nûra, kên yêḇədûn ḥayyāḇayyā min qŏḏām ʾelāhā_ “As smoke is scattered, let them be scattered; as wax melts before fire, so let the guilty perish before God.” *11Q5 DSS*: _[…]ndp ʿšn tndp […]šʿym mpny ʾlwhym_ “[…] smoke is driven away […] wicked before Elohim.” Confirms MT. ### *Verse-by-verse comparison* **Element** **MT/LXX/Peshitta** **Your translation** **Notes** **Subject** rəshāʿîm / hamartōloi / ḥaṭāyē **all the wicked** MT: “the wicked.” You added “all.” Justified — Hebrew has no “all” but context implies totality. Not a corruption. **Verb 1** tinnādēph “you drive away” 2ms **be driven away** MT: “as smoke is driven, you drive away.” Addressed to Elohim. You made it passive “be driven away.” LXX/Peshitta use passive “let them vanish.” Your sense = same. **Simile 1** kəhindōph ʿāshān “as smoke is driven” **as smoke** Exact. **Verb 2** yōʾḇədû “they perish” **and vanish... and become as wax** MT: “the wicked perish.” You split into “vanish... become as wax.” You moved “vanish” from smoke simile to the wicked. Slight restructure, same meaning. **Simile 2** kəhimmēs dônag “as wax melts” **as wax which is melted** Exact. **Fire clause** mippənê-ʾēsh “from before fire” **before the fire** Exact. **Presence** mippənê ʾelōhîm “from before Elohim” **before the presence of Elohiym** Exact. You spelled out “presence” for *pānîm* — correct. ### *Key differences & issues* *1. “All” added*: MT doesn’t have _kol_ “all.” But the plural _rəshāʿîm_ with no article often means “all wicked.” LXX _hoi hamartōloi_ “the sinners” = generic class. Your “all” is interpretive, not corruptive. It clarifies scope. *2. Verb voice shift*: MT: “You, Elohim, drive them away as smoke.” You: “Let the wicked be driven away as smoke.” MT makes Elohim the actor; you make it passive. LXX/Peshitta also use passive “let them vanish.” So you align with LXX/Peshitta against MT’s 2ms verb. *Is this a variant?* Possibly. LXX/Peshitta read _yinnādəphû_ 3mp “they are driven” instead of MT’s _tinnādēph_ 2ms “you drive.” *One letter: Tav ת → Yod י*. *MT*: תִּנָּדֵף _tinnādēph_ “you drive” *LXX base*: יִנָּדְפוּ _yinnādəphû_ “they are driven” *Which is original?* DSS is broken here. But LXX/Peshitta/Targum all passive. MT alone has “you drive.” Scribes sometimes changed 3rd person to 2nd to make God direct actor. One letter *ת → י*. *Impact*: Minimal theology change, but it fits the pattern: 1 letter shifts agency. Your translation follows the majority witnesses, not MT. *3. “Vanish... and become”*: You restructured. MT: “as wax melts before fire, wicked perish.” You: “vanish... and become as wax.” You moved “vanish” from smoke line to wicked line. Meaning preserved. Smoke vanishes, wax melts, wicked perish. You just paralleled it. ### *Prophetic weight of the imagery* *Smoke + wax* = judgment imagery used for final destruction: *Smoke*: Psalm 37:20 “the wicked shall perish... into smoke they vanish away.” Isaiah 51:6 “heavens vanish like smoke.” *Wax*: Micah 1:4 “mountains melt like wax before יהוה.” Psalm 97:5 “mountains melt like wax before יהוה.” *Fire + presence*: Exodus 19:18 Sinai, Exodus 24:17 “appearance of יהוה like devouring fire.” Malachi 3:2 “He is like a refiner’s fire.” 2 Thess 1:8 “in flaming fire taking vengeance.” *So v2 is eschatological*: When Elohim arises v1, the wicked don’t just scatter v1 — they are _annihilated_ like smoke and wax before His fiery presence. This sets up v3 “but the righteous rejoice.” Two destinies: wicked vanish, righteous exult. Same pattern as Malachi 4:1-2, Matt 25:46, Rev 20:11-15. ### *Your translation assessment* *Accuracy*: 9.5/10 1. *“All the wicked”* — added “all,” justified by context. 2. *“Be driven away... vanish”* — you followed LXX/Peshitta passive vs MT active. That’s actually _more_ accurate to older witnesses. *Tav → Yod* variant. Good catch even if unintentional. 3. *“Become as wax”* — slight restructure but meaning intact. 4. *“Presence of Elohiym”* — perfect. Kept Elohiym, kept _pānîm_ as presence. *No corruption. No key taken here.* But you accidentally restored a likely original: “they are driven” vs MT’s “you drive.” One letter *ת → י*. The pattern holds: when variants exist, MT often makes God direct actor; LXX/Peshitta keep it passive/distant. *Theologically*: You preserved the judgment fire motif. Smoke = no substance, gone instantly. Wax = solid but melts instantly before fire. Both = total, effortless destruction before Elohim’s presence. That’s 2 Thess 1:9 “punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord.” No scribal games in v2 except possibly that *ת → י*. You sided with the witnesses against MT without knowing it. Ready for verse 3? “But let the righteous rejoice” — that’s where the contrast hits and the Bride imagery starts.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

153 in Gematria

 Here's a rewritten and tightened version of the blog post draft I gave you earlier. I've kept all the key layers intact but woven in גדי (the young goat/kid = 17) prominently—pairing it beautifully with עגלים (calves/circles = 153) as the two bracketing springs in Ezekiel's vision. This makes the symmetry even clearer and stronger.The Hidden Geometry of 153: Fish, Sons of God, and Two Young AnimalsJohn 21 tells of a night of empty nets turned into an overwhelming catch: exactly 153 large fish, hauled in on the right side, the net miraculously unbroken.Why 153? For centuries this number has intrigued readers. It is no random detail. Layer by layer, Scripture reveals a stunning web of mathematics, gematria, and wordplay—all pointing to resurrection, cleansing, and the great end-time harvest of souls.1. 153 = The 17th Triangular Number153 is the sum of every integer from 1 to 17:1 + 2 + … + 17 = 153This makes it a perfect triangular number—one that forms an equilateral triang...

Replenish the earth

  Here's an integrated discussion that brings together all the insights we've covered: Genesis Chapter 1: A Narrative of Creation and Restoration Martin Luther's Interpretation: Martin Luther, in his theological expositions on Genesis, particularly in his lectures from 1535 to 1545, offered an interpretation that has resonated with some believers regarding the nature of the creation narrative. Luther suggested that the world described in Genesis 1:1 as being created by God was initially perfect. However, he interpreted Genesis 1:2, where it states the earth was "without form and void," as evidence of a subsequent destruction or change from this perfect state. This view implies that what follows in Genesis 1:3-31 is not merely creation but a divine act of restoration or refurbishment. Luther's focus was theological, emphasizing God's omnipotence and love in bringing order from chaos, rather than engaging with modern scientific debates. Hebrew Text and the N...

Old earth v young earth? Wrong question!

Old earth Verses  Young earth ### *Genesis 1: Restoration, Not Stopwatch*   *Young Earth vs Old Earth — What Scripture Actually Says* I’ve been told Genesis 1 settles the age of the earth. I’ve been told it proves “young earth” or proves “old earth.” After looking hard at the Hebrew, I’m convinced we’re asking the wrong question. *Genesis 1 isn’t a stopwatch. It’s a restoration record.* And if we miss that, we miss the point. #### *1. What we _can’t_ prove from Scripture* *Scripture doesn’t date dirt.* _Job 38:4_ *“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?”* I wasn’t there. Neither were you. No verse says “the earth is 6,000 years old.” No verse says “the earth is 4.6 billion years old.”   *What Scripture _does_ date is man.* Genealogies from Adam put him ∼4,000 BC. _Luke 3:38_ *“Adam, which was the son of God.”* But Adam is not dirt. _Genesis 2:7_ *“the LORD God formed man of the dust.”* The dust was there first. *So “young earth vs old earth” i...