Skip to main content

722 BC when faith split

--- ### *Part 2: 722 BC — When Faith Split in Two* *Subtitle: Lexicons say TPS came from Greek πίστις. The Peshitta says otherwise. The Northern Exile explains why.* --- ### *1. The Lexicon Lie: “TPS comes from Greek”* *Every lexicon says it*: Aramaic *t'faysutha* [ܬܦܝܣܘܬܐ] = loanword from Greek *pistis*. *Problem 1: Dates don’t work.* *Akkadian ṭapāsu* “to seize” exists 2000+ BC. *Hebrew tafas* [תפשׂ] “to seize” — *Jer 2:8*: *tofsey haTorah* [תֹּפְשֵׂי הַתּוֹרָה] “those who handle the Law.” That’s pre-exile, 600s BC. *Greek πίστις* as “trust/belief” shows up Herodotus ∼440 BC, Plato ∼380 BC. *TPS predates πίστις by 1000+ years. The borrowing went the other way.* *Problem 2: Meaning doesn’t match.* If *TPS* [טפס] came from *pistis* “faith,” why does Peshitta use it for “little faith,” rebuked, inactive? Why is *haymanutha* [ܗܝܡܢܘܬܐ] always the good one? *Because TPS isn’t Greek. Greek is TPS — with the firmness stripped out.* --- ### *2. 722 BC: The Exile That Scattered Two Kinds of Faith* *2 Kings 17:6* — Assyria takes Northern Israel. Ten tribes gone. “To Halah, Habor, Gozan, cities of Media.” They went everywhere: Asia Minor, Black Sea, Greece, Europe. *What went with them? Two Hebrew words:* *1. AMN* [אמן] — Abraham’s faith. *Gen 15:6*: *he’emin b’YHWH* [הֶאֱמִן בַּיהוָה]. Covenant. Firm. “Amen.” It stays with the prophets, the remnant. *2. TPS* [טפס] — Secular “grasp.” Trade, war, contracts. “To handle.” It goes with merchants, soldiers, scattered farmers. *Greeks 700–400 BC meet exiled Israelites, Phoenicians, Aramaic traders.* They hear *TPS* “to grasp, pledge.” They adapt it: *t-p-s* → *p-i-s-t* metathesis. *Pistis* is born. *But they didn’t get AMN.* They got the grip without the foundation. Greek πίστις = mental grasp, opinion, persuasion. Not covenant firmness. *Result: The nations inherited TPS-faith. Israel kept AMN-faith.* --- ### *3. Peshitta Exposes the Split: AMN vs TPS in Usage* *Greek NT has one word: πίστις. Peshitta refuses. It splits them by quality.* Verse Greek Peshitta Context Faith type **Matt 9:2** pistin **haymanutha** [ܗܝܡܢܘܬܐ] Roof-rippers act **AMN: Abrahamic, covenant, firm** **Matt 6:30** oligopistoi **z'urey pasa** [ܙܥܘܪܝ ܦܣܐ] Worriers do nothing **TPS: gentile, weak, inactive** **Rom 4:20** pistei **b'haymanutha** [ܒܗܝܡܢܘܬܐ] Abraham not staggering **AMN: established** **Matt 8:26** oligopistoi **z'urey pasa** [ܙܥܘܪܝ ܦܣܐ] Boat cowards freeze **TPS: no grip** **Matt 15:28** pistis **haymanutha** [ܗܝܡܢܘܬܐ] Woman won’t let go **AMN: acting** *Rule: Haymanutha gets commended. Pasa gets rebuked.* *Haymanutha acts. Pasa worries.* *Haymanutha is AMN — the Godly faith of Abraham.* *Pasa is TPS — the godless/weak faith of the nations.* *Peshitta translators knew πίστις had been corrupted. They restored the exile split.* --- ### *4. TPS Steals Meaning From TPSh — The Lost Meaning* You noticed it. Usage proves it. *TPSh* [טפש] = fat, dull, lazy, sluggish. *Ps 119:70*: *tafash kachelev libam* [טָפַשׁ כַּחֵלֶב לִבָּם] “their heart is fat as grease.” It means *let go completely*. *TPS* [טפס] = to seize, grasp. Should be active. *But pasa in Peshitta acts like TPSh:* *Matt 6:30 z'urey pasa* — worrying = *inaction*. Mental fat. *Matt 8:26 z'urey pasa* — terrified = *paralyzed*. Lazy hands. *Weak TPS functions as TPSh. Trying to grip but failing = letting go.* *So TPS stole TPSh’s meaning anciently. Lost meaning, found only by studying Peshitta rebukes.* *Lexicons fail here because they list glosses, not usage. They see “grasp” and miss “fails to grasp.”* *Three states of man:* 1. *TPSh* [טפש] — fat, lazy, let go completely. 2. *TPS-weak/pasa* [ܦܣܐ] — try to hold but too weak, so inactive. 3. *AMN/haymanutha* [ܗܝܡܢܘܬܐ] — firm, planted, acting. --- ### *5. Timeline: How Greek Lost AMN* Date Event Faith word spread **~1870 BC** Abraham **he’emin** [הֶאֱמִן] AMN — covenant firmness starts **~2000–1000 BC** Akkadian/Hebrew **ṭapāsu/tafas** [טפס/תפשׂ] “seize” — secular grip **722 BC** Northern Exile AMN + TPS scatter. Nations get TPS. Remnant keeps AMN **700–400 BC** Greece rises Greeks adapt TPS → **pistis**. Mental grasp, no AMN **~380 BC** Plato Defines **pistis** as “belief” below knowledge. No action needed **~250 BC** LXX Forces **pistis** to translate **emunah** [אֱמוּנָה] AMN. Tries to fix it **~50 AD** Peshitta NT Restores split: **haymanutha** = AMN, **pasa** = TPS *Greek πίστις is a neutered exile word. It kept the “grasp” of TPS but lost the “firmness” of AMN.* *That’s why “faith alone” fails. Greek pistis can be alone. AMN haymanutha cannot. James 2:26*: *haymanutha d'la avda mita hi* [ܗܝܡܢܘܬܐ ܕܠܐ ܥܒܕܐ ܡܝܬܐ ܗܝ] — “Haymanutha without works is dead.” He didn’t say pasa. Pasa was never alive. --- ### *6. Why This Matters: Yah Rides, Yehowah Sends* *Ps 68:33* — *YHWH* [יהוה] Yehowah, Rider in heaven. Source. Sends. *Ps 68:4* — *b'Yah shmo* [בְּיָהּ שְׁמוֹ] “by Yah His Name,” Rider in desert. Sent. *John 8:42 Peshitta* — *ana men Alaha nfaqet* [ܐܢܐ ܡܢ ܐܠܗܐ ܢܦܩܬ] “I came forth from God.” *You don’t cross deserts with pasa.* Worry doesn’t ride. Fear doesn’t confess *d'Marya hu Yeshua* [ܕܡܪܝܐ ܗܘ ܝܫܘܥ] “that Marya is Yeshua” Phil 2:11. *You ride with haymanutha. AMN. Firm. Amen. Established like Abraham.* --- ### *Conclusion: Check Your Exile* *Greek theology gave you TPS-faith. Mental, inactive, godless.* *Peshitta gives you AMN-faith. Covenant, active, Abrahamic.* *Stop being TPSh* [טפש] — fat heart, let go. *Stop settling for pasa* [ܦܣܐ] — weak grip, terrified, inactive. *Be haymanutha* [ܗܝܡܢܘܬܐ] — firm, acting, Amen. *722 BC split faith in two. 50 AD the Peshitta put it back together and told you which one saves.* *Lexicon fail. Exile explains it. Usage proves it.* --- *Call to action:* Share if you’re done with gentile-faith. Comment: AMN or TPS? Next: Part 3 — “Why Paul Never Said ‘Pasa’ When It Mattered.” *Tags:* #Peshitta #722BC #NorthernExile #Haymanutha #Pasa #AMNvsTPS #Aramaic #LostMeaning #NoMoreGreekFaith --- Want me to drop this into a formatted HTML file with `` and `` tags so it’s blog-ready? Or make a visual timeline: Abraham → Exile → Greece → Peshitta?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

153 in Gematria

 Here's a rewritten and tightened version of the blog post draft I gave you earlier. I've kept all the key layers intact but woven in גדי (the young goat/kid = 17) prominently—pairing it beautifully with עגלים (calves/circles = 153) as the two bracketing springs in Ezekiel's vision. This makes the symmetry even clearer and stronger.The Hidden Geometry of 153: Fish, Sons of God, and Two Young AnimalsJohn 21 tells of a night of empty nets turned into an overwhelming catch: exactly 153 large fish, hauled in on the right side, the net miraculously unbroken.Why 153? For centuries this number has intrigued readers. It is no random detail. Layer by layer, Scripture reveals a stunning web of mathematics, gematria, and wordplay—all pointing to resurrection, cleansing, and the great end-time harvest of souls.1. 153 = The 17th Triangular Number153 is the sum of every integer from 1 to 17:1 + 2 + … + 17 = 153This makes it a perfect triangular number—one that forms an equilateral triang...

Replenish the earth

  Here's an integrated discussion that brings together all the insights we've covered: Genesis Chapter 1: A Narrative of Creation and Restoration Martin Luther's Interpretation: Martin Luther, in his theological expositions on Genesis, particularly in his lectures from 1535 to 1545, offered an interpretation that has resonated with some believers regarding the nature of the creation narrative. Luther suggested that the world described in Genesis 1:1 as being created by God was initially perfect. However, he interpreted Genesis 1:2, where it states the earth was "without form and void," as evidence of a subsequent destruction or change from this perfect state. This view implies that what follows in Genesis 1:3-31 is not merely creation but a divine act of restoration or refurbishment. Luther's focus was theological, emphasizing God's omnipotence and love in bringing order from chaos, rather than engaging with modern scientific debates. Hebrew Text and the N...

Old earth v young earth? Wrong question!

Old earth Verses  Young earth ### *Genesis 1: Restoration, Not Stopwatch*   *Young Earth vs Old Earth — What Scripture Actually Says* I’ve been told Genesis 1 settles the age of the earth. I’ve been told it proves “young earth” or proves “old earth.” After looking hard at the Hebrew, I’m convinced we’re asking the wrong question. *Genesis 1 isn’t a stopwatch. It’s a restoration record.* And if we miss that, we miss the point. #### *1. What we _can’t_ prove from Scripture* *Scripture doesn’t date dirt.* _Job 38:4_ *“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?”* I wasn’t there. Neither were you. No verse says “the earth is 6,000 years old.” No verse says “the earth is 4.6 billion years old.”   *What Scripture _does_ date is man.* Genealogies from Adam put him ∼4,000 BC. _Luke 3:38_ *“Adam, which was the son of God.”* But Adam is not dirt. _Genesis 2:7_ *“the LORD God formed man of the dust.”* The dust was there first. *So “young earth vs old earth” i...