Skip to main content

Two natures/Son fenced in

*Got it. Keeping it tight. Topic: Two Natures. Here Mar-Yah = Lord Yah, the Son. Not Lord YHWH the Father. English only, no foreign script.* --- *Title: Two Natures, One Name — Why Mar-Yah Bled* The enemy blurs what God made distinct. I won’t. This is about two natures. And the blood proves it. ### *1. The Word Fenced Himself In — Aggen* John 1:14 Peshitta: “And the Word became flesh and *fenced/gardened among us*” Not “pitched a tent.” Not temporary. *Aggen* means to wall in, to protect by surrounding. Isaiah 31:5: “YHWH will *fence/protect* over Jerusalem” 2 Kings 19:34: “*I will fence* over this city” John took YHWH’s covenant word and drove it into bone and sinew. Job 10:11 says God wove us: “Skin and flesh You clothed me, with bones and sinews You *fenced* me.” The Word did to Himself what YHWH did to Job. He took a body. He fenced Himself in. Psalm 68:18 demanded it: “that YAH God might dwell *among men*.” You can’t dwell among men without a man’s body. ### *2. Two Natures — Treyn Qnome* *Qnoma* = nature, substance. The _what_ that makes something what it is. *Hebrews 2:14:* “Because the children shared in flesh and blood, He also likewise shared in them” He took the *nature of flesh*. Real. Breakable. *Colossians 2:9:* “In Him dwells all the fullness of Godhead bodily” He kept the *nature of Godhead*. Unbroken. You can’t *aggen* unless you have two things: 1. The One doing the fencing — Divine nature 2. The fence itself — Human nature One nature erases aggen. Two natures, one Person. ### *3. He Died Apart From God — Setar Men Alaha* *Hebrews 2:9 Eastern Peshitta:* “that He *apart from God* for everyone tasted death” God cannot die. Habakkuk 1:12: “You shall not die.” 1 Timothy 6:16: “who alone has immortality.” So _who_ tasted death? The human nature. The fence died. The One fenced did not. *Setar men Alaha* — apart from God — means the divine nature did not die. The human nature did. This is why men were martyred. They confessed: “Messiah is God and Man in two natures.” If God died, who raised Him? If only a man died, we’re not redeemed. Answer: The God-Man died _in His flesh_, apart from His divine nature dying. ### *4. Mar-Yah Here = Lord Yah, The Son — Not Lord YHWH the Father* This is critical. *Mar-Yah* = Mar + Yah = Lord + YAH. In Old Testament quotes, Mar-Yah = YHWH the Father. *Example — Psalm 110:1:* “Mar-Yah said to my Lord” — YHWH speaks to Adonai. *Everywhere else in the New Testament, Mar-Yah = The Son.* Why? Because He bears the Name. *Exodus 23:21:* “My Name is in Him” — speaking of the Angel of YHWH. *John 17:11:* “Holy Father, keep them in Your Name which You gave Me” The Father’s Name is YHWH. The Son receives it. So the Son is called *Mar-Yah — Lord YAH*. Not because He’s the Father. Because He’s the Son of YHWH bearing YHWH’s Name. *Proof:* *1 Corinthians 12:3:* “No one can say *Mar-Yah is Jesus* except by the Holy Spirit” *Philippians 2:11:* “Every tongue confess that *Mar-Yah is Jesus Messiah*, to the glory of God His Father” Jesus IS Mar-Yah. To the glory of God _His Father_. Two distinct. Same Name. ### *5. The Blood of Mar-Yah* *1 Corinthians 11:27:* “guilty of the blood and body *of Mar-Yah*” Mar-Yah has blood. The Father doesn’t. The Son does. Because He *aggen* in flesh. *Acts 20:28 Western:* “church of God which He purchased with His own blood” *Acts 20:28 Eastern:* “church of Messiah which He purchased with His blood” Both true. It’s God’s blood because Mar-Yah the Son is God. It’s Messiah’s blood because the Anointed One bled, *setar men Alaha* — apart from God dying. ### *The Line Is Drawn* 1. *Aggen*: The Word fenced YAH in flesh. Among us. Not over us. 2. *Treyn Qnome*: Divine nature fenced. Human nature is the fence. 3. *Setar men Alaha*: The fence died. The Fencer raised it. John 2:19. 4. *Mar-Yah*: Here He is Lord Yah, the Son of YHWH. Not Lord YHWH the Father. The Son bears the Name, takes flesh, sheds blood. *The enemy obscures:* Makes aggen into “tent.” Makes two natures into one. Makes Mar-Yah into generic “Lord.” *I make distinct:* The Word fenced Himself in bone. The bone bled. The blood is YAH’s because YAH’s Son took flesh. *Confusion stops when Aggen starts. The fence bled. The Fencer lives. Drink the cup of Mar-Yah knowing who bled.*

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

153 in Gematria

 Here's a rewritten and tightened version of the blog post draft I gave you earlier. I've kept all the key layers intact but woven in גדי (the young goat/kid = 17) prominently—pairing it beautifully with עגלים (calves/circles = 153) as the two bracketing springs in Ezekiel's vision. This makes the symmetry even clearer and stronger.The Hidden Geometry of 153: Fish, Sons of God, and Two Young AnimalsJohn 21 tells of a night of empty nets turned into an overwhelming catch: exactly 153 large fish, hauled in on the right side, the net miraculously unbroken.Why 153? For centuries this number has intrigued readers. It is no random detail. Layer by layer, Scripture reveals a stunning web of mathematics, gematria, and wordplay—all pointing to resurrection, cleansing, and the great end-time harvest of souls.1. 153 = The 17th Triangular Number153 is the sum of every integer from 1 to 17:1 + 2 + … + 17 = 153This makes it a perfect triangular number—one that forms an equilateral triang...
Post a Comment
Read more

Replenish the earth

  Here's an integrated discussion that brings together all the insights we've covered: Genesis Chapter 1: A Narrative of Creation and Restoration Martin Luther's Interpretation: Martin Luther, in his theological expositions on Genesis, particularly in his lectures from 1535 to 1545, offered an interpretation that has resonated with some believers regarding the nature of the creation narrative. Luther suggested that the world described in Genesis 1:1 as being created by God was initially perfect. However, he interpreted Genesis 1:2, where it states the earth was "without form and void," as evidence of a subsequent destruction or change from this perfect state. This view implies that what follows in Genesis 1:3-31 is not merely creation but a divine act of restoration or refurbishment. Luther's focus was theological, emphasizing God's omnipotence and love in bringing order from chaos, rather than engaging with modern scientific debates. Hebrew Text and the N...
Post a Comment
Read more

Old earth v young earth? Wrong question!

Old earth Verses  Young earth ### *Genesis 1: Restoration, Not Stopwatch*   *Young Earth vs Old Earth — What Scripture Actually Says* I’ve been told Genesis 1 settles the age of the earth. I’ve been told it proves “young earth” or proves “old earth.” After looking hard at the Hebrew, I’m convinced we’re asking the wrong question. *Genesis 1 isn’t a stopwatch. It’s a restoration record.* And if we miss that, we miss the point. #### *1. What we _can’t_ prove from Scripture* *Scripture doesn’t date dirt.* _Job 38:4_ *“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?”* I wasn’t there. Neither were you. No verse says “the earth is 6,000 years old.” No verse says “the earth is 4.6 billion years old.”   *What Scripture _does_ date is man.* Genealogies from Adam put him ∼4,000 BC. _Luke 3:38_ *“Adam, which was the son of God.”* But Adam is not dirt. _Genesis 2:7_ *“the LORD God formed man of the dust.”* The dust was there first. *So “young earth vs old earth” i...
Post a Comment
Read more