Skip to main content

Sick or polished?

### *Caught and Refined, Part 2: The Night My Hands Wouldn’t Stop* *Psalm 77:10* _Va’omar chaloti hi shenot yemin elyon_ “And I said, ‘This is my infirmity: the years of the right hand of the Most High.’” *That’s what the translations say. I don’t buy it.* Asaph is sleepless. Verse 2: _“My hand is stretched out in the night and does not grow numb.”_ He’s waving, restless, grinding. And then he says _chaloti_. *חלה _chalah*_ = to be weak, sick. *חלל _chalal*_ = to pierce, bore, wound. To play the flute _chalil_ because you bore holes. To begin, because you pierce into something new. *The root idea isn’t “infirmity.” It’s friction.* Tumbling stones. Grinding. Sanding. Boring holes until music comes out. *So read it again:* _“And I said, ‘This is my tumbling. This is the work of the right hand of the Most High.’”_ Asaph wasn’t dying. He was being polished. *Here’s the part translations won’t tell you:* Polishing feels like sickness while it’s happening. Stones in a tumbler don’t feel beautiful. They feel knocked around. Your edges are getting hit. You’re losing pieces of yourself. Of course you feel weak. Of course your hands won’t stop in the night. You’re not broken. You’re in process. *The right hand of God isn’t just strong. It’s a lapidary’s hand.* It holds the rough stone still long enough to make it shine. It bores the holes until there’s a song. It doesn’t stop the tumbler early because you’re uncomfortable. So if you’re up at 2 AM, hands restless, feeling ground down by life — maybe this isn’t infirmity. Maybe it’s _chaloti_. Your tumbling. *Weakness is the side effect. Beauty is the point.* The stone doesn’t know it’s becoming a sapphire while it’s in the grit. Neither did Asaph. But he figured it out mid-psalm. _“This is the years of His right hand.”_ He’s not rejecting you. He’s refusing to leave you rough. --- *Want me to trim it tighter or add a one-line kicker at the end?*

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

153 in Gematria

 Here's a rewritten and tightened version of the blog post draft I gave you earlier. I've kept all the key layers intact but woven in גדי (the young goat/kid = 17) prominently—pairing it beautifully with עגלים (calves/circles = 153) as the two bracketing springs in Ezekiel's vision. This makes the symmetry even clearer and stronger.The Hidden Geometry of 153: Fish, Sons of God, and Two Young AnimalsJohn 21 tells of a night of empty nets turned into an overwhelming catch: exactly 153 large fish, hauled in on the right side, the net miraculously unbroken.Why 153? For centuries this number has intrigued readers. It is no random detail. Layer by layer, Scripture reveals a stunning web of mathematics, gematria, and wordplay—all pointing to resurrection, cleansing, and the great end-time harvest of souls.1. 153 = The 17th Triangular Number153 is the sum of every integer from 1 to 17:1 + 2 + … + 17 = 153This makes it a perfect triangular number—one that forms an equilateral triang...
Post a Comment
Read more

Old earth v young earth? Wrong question!

Old earth Verses  Young earth ### *Genesis 1: Restoration, Not Stopwatch*   *Young Earth vs Old Earth — What Scripture Actually Says* I’ve been told Genesis 1 settles the age of the earth. I’ve been told it proves “young earth” or proves “old earth.” After looking hard at the Hebrew, I’m convinced we’re asking the wrong question. *Genesis 1 isn’t a stopwatch. It’s a restoration record.* And if we miss that, we miss the point. #### *1. What we _can’t_ prove from Scripture* *Scripture doesn’t date dirt.* _Job 38:4_ *“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?”* I wasn’t there. Neither were you. No verse says “the earth is 6,000 years old.” No verse says “the earth is 4.6 billion years old.”   *What Scripture _does_ date is man.* Genealogies from Adam put him ∼4,000 BC. _Luke 3:38_ *“Adam, which was the son of God.”* But Adam is not dirt. _Genesis 2:7_ *“the LORD God formed man of the dust.”* The dust was there first. *So “young earth vs old earth” i...
Post a Comment
Read more

Replenish the earth

  Here's an integrated discussion that brings together all the insights we've covered: Genesis Chapter 1: A Narrative of Creation and Restoration Martin Luther's Interpretation: Martin Luther, in his theological expositions on Genesis, particularly in his lectures from 1535 to 1545, offered an interpretation that has resonated with some believers regarding the nature of the creation narrative. Luther suggested that the world described in Genesis 1:1 as being created by God was initially perfect. However, he interpreted Genesis 1:2, where it states the earth was "without form and void," as evidence of a subsequent destruction or change from this perfect state. This view implies that what follows in Genesis 1:3-31 is not merely creation but a divine act of restoration or refurbishment. Luther's focus was theological, emphasizing God's omnipotence and love in bringing order from chaos, rather than engaging with modern scientific debates. Hebrew Text and the N...
Post a Comment
Read more