Skip to main content

Isa 28:15 to get carried away

*Isa 28:15 — The Overflowing That Rows Across* Complete translation, as I now see it: *ki amartem karatnu brit et-mavet ve-im Sheol asinu chozeh shot shoteph ki ya'avor lo yevo'enu ki samnu chazav machsenu uva-sheker nistarenu [כִּי אֲמַרְתֶּם כָּרַתְנוּ בְרִית אֶת־מָוֶת וְעִם־שְׁאוֹל עָשִׂינוּ חֹזֶה שׁוֹט שׁוֹטֵף כִּי־יַעֲבֹר לֹא יְבוֹאֵנוּ כִּי שַׂמְנוּ כָזָב מַחְסֵנוּ וּבַשֶּׁקֶר נִסְתָּרְנוּ]* "For you have said, We have cut a covenant with Death, and with Sheol we have made a pact — *shot shoteph ki ya'avor [שׁוֹט שׁוֹטֵף כִּי־יַעֲבֹר]* — the overflowing that rows across when it passes over — shall not come to us, for we have made lies our refuge and in falsehood we have hidden ourselves." Not "overflowing scourge." A whip does not overflow. A river does. *shot [שׁוֹט]* — Strongs 7751 *shut [שׁוּט]* — to row, to rove, to go about — the oar — *shayit [שַׁיִט]* — *meshot [מְשׁוֹט]* — oar *shoteph [שׁוֹטֵף]* — Strongs 7857 *shataph [שָׁטַף]* — to overflow, to flood, to rinse away — participle — overflowing *shot shoteph [שׁוֹט שׁוֹטֵף]* — the roving flood — the ferrying overflow — that which rows you across against your will into exile. *LXX vs Targum — both heard water:* *LXX:* *ean epelthe kataigis pheromene [ἐὰν ἐπέλθῃ καταιγὶς φερομένη]* — "if a rushing storm should come upon" LXX lost *shot [שׁוֹט]* as whip entirely. They read only *shataph [שׁטף]*. For them it is just weather, just flood. No oar, no chastisement. That fits rulers — "it's just politics, just a storm, it will pass." *Targum Jonathan:* *machah de-madbarana [מְחָאָה דְּמַדְבְּרָנָא]* — "a blow that carries into wandering / wilderness" Targum kept movement. Not whip — *machah [מְחָאָה]* — blow that exiles. He heard *shut [שׁוּט]* — to rove, to wander. Targum understands: this is not beaten, this is _floated away_. Exile as forced rowing. Both LXX and Targum agree: water, not whip. LXX says storm passes over. Targum says you are carried away in it. *Peshitta — the misreading:* Peshitta follows the Qere *shot [שׁוֹט]* as 7752 *shot [שׁוֹט]* — whip, scourge — national chastisement. *shot'a [ܫܘܛܐ]* — whip It keeps *shoteph [שׁוֹטֵף]* as flood, so it renders "overflowing scourge." But as I said, scourge does not overflow. This is conflation of two roots because later scribes thought only of punishment, not transport. They turned the river into a whip. But Isaiah in *Isa 8:7-8* already defined Assyria as *mei ha-nahar ha-atzumim ve-ha-rabbim ve-shataf [מֵי הַנָּהָר הָעֲצוּמִים וְהָרַבִּים וְשָׁטַף]* — the mighty many waters overflowing. The overflowing does not whip you — it rows you across. Boat loses control. Direction forced. Into exile. The rulers said it would not come to them. But the river rows all who make lies their refuge.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

153 in Gematria

 Here's a rewritten and tightened version of the blog post draft I gave you earlier. I've kept all the key layers intact but woven in גדי (the young goat/kid = 17) prominently—pairing it beautifully with עגלים (calves/circles = 153) as the two bracketing springs in Ezekiel's vision. This makes the symmetry even clearer and stronger.The Hidden Geometry of 153: Fish, Sons of God, and Two Young AnimalsJohn 21 tells of a night of empty nets turned into an overwhelming catch: exactly 153 large fish, hauled in on the right side, the net miraculously unbroken.Why 153? For centuries this number has intrigued readers. It is no random detail. Layer by layer, Scripture reveals a stunning web of mathematics, gematria, and wordplay—all pointing to resurrection, cleansing, and the great end-time harvest of souls.1. 153 = The 17th Triangular Number153 is the sum of every integer from 1 to 17:1 + 2 + … + 17 = 153This makes it a perfect triangular number—one that forms an equilateral triang...

Old earth v young earth? Wrong question!

Old earth Verses  Young earth ### *Genesis 1: Restoration, Not Stopwatch*   *Young Earth vs Old Earth — What Scripture Actually Says* I’ve been told Genesis 1 settles the age of the earth. I’ve been told it proves “young earth” or proves “old earth.” After looking hard at the Hebrew, I’m convinced we’re asking the wrong question. *Genesis 1 isn’t a stopwatch. It’s a restoration record.* And if we miss that, we miss the point. #### *1. What we _can’t_ prove from Scripture* *Scripture doesn’t date dirt.* _Job 38:4_ *“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?”* I wasn’t there. Neither were you. No verse says “the earth is 6,000 years old.” No verse says “the earth is 4.6 billion years old.”   *What Scripture _does_ date is man.* Genealogies from Adam put him ∼4,000 BC. _Luke 3:38_ *“Adam, which was the son of God.”* But Adam is not dirt. _Genesis 2:7_ *“the LORD God formed man of the dust.”* The dust was there first. *So “young earth vs old earth” i...

Replenish the earth

  Here's an integrated discussion that brings together all the insights we've covered: Genesis Chapter 1: A Narrative of Creation and Restoration Martin Luther's Interpretation: Martin Luther, in his theological expositions on Genesis, particularly in his lectures from 1535 to 1545, offered an interpretation that has resonated with some believers regarding the nature of the creation narrative. Luther suggested that the world described in Genesis 1:1 as being created by God was initially perfect. However, he interpreted Genesis 1:2, where it states the earth was "without form and void," as evidence of a subsequent destruction or change from this perfect state. This view implies that what follows in Genesis 1:3-31 is not merely creation but a divine act of restoration or refurbishment. Luther's focus was theological, emphasizing God's omnipotence and love in bringing order from chaos, rather than engaging with modern scientific debates. Hebrew Text and the N...