Skip to main content

5B6(4) - Child Born, Son Given, Builder (Father and Son are ONE)

 Sec 5B6(4) - Child Born, Son Given, Builder (Father and Son are ONE)


5.b.6 - The Oneness of the Father and His Son - Part 4: A Child Born, A Son Given - The Builder


When a child is born into the world in the natural sense, it is obvious that a new separate person has entered the world. When a Son is given to the mother by its father, in the human sense, no one would dispute that this father and son are two entirely separate people with separate wills.


However, when a child is born, and a Son is given, who came forth from Yehowah, our omnipresent Creator of heaven and earth, then one ought to consider how these picturistic Hebrew words might shed light on these things, for it is written:


For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty Elohym, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace. Isaiah 9:6


This child who was born, and this Son who was given, is also called, "The mighty El" and "The Everlasting Father"! These are terms which are reserved in Scripture only for Yehowah, our heavenly Father and Creator. And Yehowah is also a jealous El [Deuteronomy 4:24], and there is none else beside HIM [Deuteronomy 4:35, 39]. It is also written concerning HIM:


I am Yehowah: that is my name: and my glory will I not give to another,.. Isaiah 42:8

Ye are my witnesses, saith Yehowah, and my servant whom I have chosen; that ye may know and believe me, and understand that I am He: before me there was no Elohym formed, neither shall there be after me. I, even I, am Yehowah; and beside me there is no saviour. Isa 43:10-11


... Is there a Elohym beside me? yea, there is no Elohym; I know not any. Isaiah 44:8

Thus saith Yehowah, the King of Israel, and his redeemer Yehowah of hosts: "I am the first, and I am the last; and beside Me there is no Elohym." Isaiah 44:6


And lest we think that Yehowah is telling us, "Hey guys, serve only us", it is also written:

Hear O Israel, Yehowah our Elohym is one Yehowah. Deuteronomy 6:4


Therefore, if we ascribe the attributes of "the mighty El" and the "Everlasting Father" to another person entirely separate from Yehowah, even the Son of Yehowah, then Yehowah is no longer one in our eyes.


There are some who claim that this term for "Mighty El", is a reference only unto the Son. However this term is also used to describe Yehowah:

And it shall come to pass in that day, that the remnant of Israel, and such as are escaped of the house of Jacob, shall no more again stay upon him that smote them; but shall stay upon Yehowah, the Holy One of Israel, in truth. The remnant shall return, even the remnant of Jacob, unto the mighty Elohym. Isaiah 10:20-21


Therefore, the same writer of Isaiah 9:6, also wrote Isaiah 10:20-21 and used the same spelling for "The mighty El" in both contexts, of the Son and of Yehowah the Father.


Yehowah does say that He will not give his praise to a graven image [Isaiah 42:8]. But to claim that this is the only form of idolatry which would be displeasing unto Yehowah, is misleading. Yet, despite all these things, Yehowah does share His glory with the child who was born into the world in His name and the Son who was given unto the world. So, for these reasons, we must look deeper into the Hebrew meaning behind these words. We will first discuss the "Son" then the terms, "child" and "born".


The first word, "son", is Ben in Hebrew and is derived from banah. Banah is "to build" [to erect as a house, a temple, & etc.]

Yah Yeshua, the "Son" of Yehowah, came to this earth to build the house of Yehowah. Now in the west, when we think of building a house, we think about building a structure for habitation. Yet, in the ancient Hebrew, this thought is secondary. The primary idea of banah is to build up a family, which is why son and daughter both derive from this same root word.

Now the son had the responsibility of building up the name of his father by having many children and this was considered "building the house of his father." Now the children have need of a solidly-built house in which to abide, so the house is for the protection of the children. Now the name of the father would pass on through his son, unto his grandchildren, through his son's lineage. This is why most people nowadays have last names, which reveals an ancient father who gave forth that name originally.


This is also why the enemy fights so hard against the teaching of the name of Elohym. The enemy does not mind us playing church, as long as we are not called by the name of our heavenly Father and His Son. And this is why most of the church world continues baptizing in titles, using their one singular scripture [Matthew 28:19], which they don't understand, to establish their false doctrine.


Yet, Yeshua came to build up the name of His Father, by having many children born into the Kingdom, who are called by the name of the Father and the Son. Yah Yeshua is the builder of the house, and his children are his house, as it is written:


For this man was counted worthy of more glory than Moses, inasmuch as he who builded the house hath more honour than the house. Hebrews 3:3[Yeshua]


But MESSIAH was a son over his own house; whose house are we, if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoicing of the hope firm unto the end. Hebrews 3:6


Moses is a part of the house, which means that he is one of the many children in the house.


 Yet, Yah Yeshua is the builder of the house. Even a father can fulfill the work of a son by building up his own house, which means, "to bear many children". This idea of Yehowah looking around for someone to help Him is illustrated in this verse:


And I looked, and there was none to help; and I wondered that there was none to uphold, therefore mine own arm brought salvation unto me... Isaiah 63:5


Yehowah built his own house with His own arm. Yes, Yah is the Arm of Yehowah. But as the arm of Yehowah, Yah, the Son, is also part of Yehowah. That Yehowah builds the house through the use of His right arm is made plain, as we read:


Except Yehowah build the house, they labour in vain that build it... Psalm 127:1


Therefore, the WILL of the Father and the Son are identical when it comes to building the house, and it is impossible for two separate distinct persons to have a single WILL between them!


The second word we must examine about the Father and Son is "child", also "born". It is the Hebrew word, yeled. The primary idea behind this word is "TO BE BROUGHT FORTH", just as the child coming forth from the womb of its mother when it is born. Likewise, Yah was brought forth out of hiding, out of the dark clouds of the bosom of Yehowah, to come into the world. And when Yah entered the world, He was given a mortal body to dwell in, as it is written:


Because of this, when entering into the world, he said: "In sacrifices and offerings you have no delight, so you clothed me with a body." Hebrews 10:5, my translation of Aramaic Peshitta


Yah was clothed with a body, so He could freely offer it up as a sacrifice upon the tree.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

153 in Gematria

 Here's a rewritten and tightened version of the blog post draft I gave you earlier. I've kept all the key layers intact but woven in גדי (the young goat/kid = 17) prominently—pairing it beautifully with עגלים (calves/circles = 153) as the two bracketing springs in Ezekiel's vision. This makes the symmetry even clearer and stronger.The Hidden Geometry of 153: Fish, Sons of God, and Two Young AnimalsJohn 21 tells of a night of empty nets turned into an overwhelming catch: exactly 153 large fish, hauled in on the right side, the net miraculously unbroken.Why 153? For centuries this number has intrigued readers. It is no random detail. Layer by layer, Scripture reveals a stunning web of mathematics, gematria, and wordplay—all pointing to resurrection, cleansing, and the great end-time harvest of souls.1. 153 = The 17th Triangular Number153 is the sum of every integer from 1 to 17:1 + 2 + … + 17 = 153This makes it a perfect triangular number—one that forms an equilateral triang...

Fallen angel names

 Here are the 20 chief fallen angels (Watchers) from 1 Enoch 6:7–8, written in modern Hebrew script with English pronunciation (approximate, based on scholarly consensus).# Hebrew Name English Pronunciation Meaning (if known) 1 שְׁמִיחֲזָה ShemiHAza “My name has seen” 2 עֲרַקְיָאל AraKYAl “Earth of God” 3 רָמָאֵל RaMAel “Thunder of God” 4 כּוֹכָבְאֵל KoKAvel “Star of God” 5 תַּמְיֵאל TamYEl “Perfection of God” 6 רָמִיאֵל RaMIel “Mercy of God” 7 דָּנֵאל DaNEl “God has judged” 8 זְקִיאֵל ZeKIel “God strengthens” 9 בַּרְקְיָאל BarKYAl “Lightning of God” 10 עֲשָׂאֵל ASAel “Made of God” 11 חַרְמָנִי HarMAni “Warrior” 12 בַּתְרְאֵל BatREl “Rain of God” 13 עֲנָנָאֵל AnaNAel “Cloud of God” 14 זַקְיָאֵל ZakYAel “Purity of God” 15 שַׁמְשִׁיאֵל ShamSHIel “Sun of God” 16 שְׂטָנָאֵל SaTAnel “Adversary of God” 17 תּוּרְיָאל TurYAl “Mountain of God” 18 יוֹמְיָאֵל YoMYAel “Day of God” 19 יְהַדְיָאֵל YeHADyael “Unity of God” 20 אֲרָמָרוֹס AraMAros “Cursed one” Notes:Leader: שְׁמִיחֲזָה (Shemihaza) ...

Old earth v young earth? Wrong question!

Old earth Verses  Young earth ### *Genesis 1: Restoration, Not Stopwatch*   *Young Earth vs Old Earth — What Scripture Actually Says* I’ve been told Genesis 1 settles the age of the earth. I’ve been told it proves “young earth” or proves “old earth.” After looking hard at the Hebrew, I’m convinced we’re asking the wrong question. *Genesis 1 isn’t a stopwatch. It’s a restoration record.* And if we miss that, we miss the point. #### *1. What we _can’t_ prove from Scripture* *Scripture doesn’t date dirt.* _Job 38:4_ *“Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth?”* I wasn’t there. Neither were you. No verse says “the earth is 6,000 years old.” No verse says “the earth is 4.6 billion years old.”   *What Scripture _does_ date is man.* Genealogies from Adam put him ∼4,000 BC. _Luke 3:38_ *“Adam, which was the son of God.”* But Adam is not dirt. _Genesis 2:7_ *“the LORD God formed man of the dust.”* The dust was there first. *So “young earth vs old earth” i...